An Interview with Se7en: Part One
   By Richard Thieme

   At DefCon IV, the annual hackers' convention in
   Las Vegas this July, they called him "Se7en." He's
   twenty-eight years old, an old man of the hacker
   scene, and he has just "come out" into the public
   eye after seventeen years underground. It's the
   second day of DefCon and Se7en has already given
   more than a dozen interviews to television crews.
   The attention is wearing him down.

No one can verify he has been a hacker for seventeen years.
Trying to check his references of who he knows in the scene ended in
hackers that had never heard of him. His claims to have been LOD were 
verified false. When confronted, his claims to be FRIENDS with LOD 
proved false. He could not verify his account name on lod.com or
anything else.

   "Don't call me Se7en," he said as we entered
   Spago's, an upscale restaurant in Caesar's Palace
   for dinner. "I don't want to be hassled."

   "What should we call you?" I said. "Nine?"

   Before he could answer, a young waiter approached
   our table.

   "Good evening. Are you all here for a convention?

   "Yes," we said, opening our menus.

   The waiter leaned closer and said in a
   conspiratorial whisper, "I understand the
   elevators at the Tropicana [site of DefCon III]
   still don't stop at the right floor. The
   blueprints for the Monte Carlo [this year's hotel]
   disappeared two weeks ago. The management is in a
   panic."

   So much for anonymity.

   Waiters, taxi drivers, desk clerks -- everybody in
   Vegas knew DefCon was back in town.

   Why did Se7en come out? Why did he leave the
   hacker underground and tunnel up at the age of
   twenty-eight into the bright lights of camera
   crews, the blank pitiless glare of the desert sun?

It was barely a year into his career as a hacker/phreak. This
was the quickest way to make a name for himself.

   "I'd been playing around with the idea of retiring
   for a long time. I wanted to come out before I
   retired. There are a lot of things I want to say,
   a lot of people I want to know -- I didn't have a
   game plan, exactly, but I wanted to be above
   ground for six months before I dropped out. At
   DefCon I wanted to meet a lot of people whose
   email addresses I had seen for years."

Friends from Defcon 2, only three years before had never
heard of, or seen se7en. Online contacts that had been around for
years could not recall him, and had never run into him.

   ? Does it weigh on you, being underground?

   "It does, yes. It's very isolating. You don't
   quite know what else is going on out there, you
   feel like you're in your own little world, and as
   your world starts to fall apart, as mine did --
   people going above ground, people retiring -- my
   world was getting a lot smaller. We needed new
   talent, more than the little group we had left,
   and I was getting older. I wanted to mentor some
   of the younger hackers. Help them the way others
   helped me." [In the world of hacking, a generation
   lasts about a decade. Many hackers go on to work
   as computer professionals in security,
   intelligence, or business. Participating
   whole-heartedly in the community of hackers, with
   its rigorous code of ethics, networks of mentors,
   and accumulated expertise, is often the only way
   to learn what no school knows how to teach.]

   "There's a lot to be learned from people, not just
   in the hacking underground, but life in general.
   In respect to the technology and the knowledge I
   had, it was limiting to relate to so few people.
   There were new things to learn, new perspectives -
   so much to get being out there and I was missing
   that. It was isolating."

   ? How old were you when you got into computers?

   "I was eleven when I got my first computer, a
   TRS-80. Seventeen years ago. First thing I did was
   play games. Remember, this was new to the entire
   world, and all you could do was play games at that
   point. I had no interest in programming then. The
   computer was a fancy expensive toy. It wasn't
   something to use to balance your checkbook or use
   as a communications device."

   ? When did you become aware of communications as a
   possibility?

   "About 1982, using an Apple IIe. I heard of
   modems, that you could use them to call up other
   computers and talk to them. That was exciting.

   I was into game cracking before bulletin boards.
   We were messing around with Apples with machine
   language, just screwing around with very little
   knowledge of what we were doing. We cracked our
   first game by accident. We started playing with
   different call registers, and next thing we knew,
   we had something. Copy protection was very simple
   then so it was not very impressive as a technical
   feat but when you're eleven years old and you
   cracked your first game and it was an accident on
   top of that ..."

   ? It was a power rush, wasn't it?

   "That's what it was. A power rush.

   There was a big apple computer store that opened
   then in my home town. It was mom-and-pop store,
   not a franchise or a chain. They hosted Apple
   clubs. One group talked about new hardware,
   another about software, arguing about language and
   coding, then there was a little circle of warez
   kiddies copying games they had cracked. We were a
   precursor to hacking groups, phreaking groups,
   2600, no one thought of it as crime then. It was a
   new technology that was like a great big toy. The
   difference between cracking games, cracking
   programs and cracking systems was very little.
   They were all part of a big complex puzzle we
   wanted to solve. It was just a question of how big
   a chunk of the puzzle did you want to tackle? We
   wanted to break games, that's what was interesting
   to us then, Engineers wanted to break the whole
   system. They wanted to know everything about it.
   These were people that by every definition of the
   word were hackers. They never called themselves
   that, but they were going to get into that system,
   no matter what.

   The words that are feared today -- crackers,
   phreakers -- were never brought up in the press
   back then. The TRS-80. the apple IIe was still
   brand new to the world. Very few people had them,.
   It was not like Nintendo today where everybody
   gets one. They were expensive game machines. They
   were new and people didn't know quite what to make
   of them. The only people who really knew them were
   people who used them at work."

   ? When did you become conscious of yourself as a
   hacker or phreaker?

   "Not for many years. I had my own group of friends
   through bulletin boards or school, we were just
   doing our own thing. We never thought of ourselves
   as hackers or crackers or a conspiracy or the
   underground or trying to be elite. We thought of
   ourselves as friends. We kept to ourselves and
   didn't cause trouble. We never consciously thought
   of ourselves as hackers or crackers but in
   retrospect we fit the definition. We were our own
   little mini-software piracy ring. No one ever
   questioned photocopying something - obviously not
   defense secrets or corporate secrets, of course.
   But what we meant by "information wants to be
   free" is, we would email it to ourselves or send a
   friend a disk. In seventeen years of hacking I
   never made a cent until I made a speech this
   week."

   ? What kinds of speaking are you doing?

   "I define the various types and sub-types that the
   media labels hacker, cracker or phreaker. I
   describe the types of people in each group, their
   motivations, how they differ from one another,
   their ideologies."

Read: non-technical.

   ? Do you discuss technique?

   "No, these [his recent talk was for engineers in a
   space program] are UNIX-heads. They know UNIX is
   inherently weak. One joke I heard when I came in
   was, "UNIX and security are an oxymoron." That
   made me feel good, because I knew I was talking to
   people who knew that you can't fix security in
   UNIX. The public is screaming, "Oh my god, hackers
   are getting in, they need to fix security," but
   they're clueless! UNIX is insecure, period. End of
   story.

Yet this comes from someone who claims to be able to secure
a unix server from outside attack. One that preaches Unix is 
drastically more secure than NT.

   The engineers' concerns about security were
   twofold: (1) Their approach to security has been
   to be as obscure as possible. They wanted to be
   invisible. They had very few problems because
   their systems aren't even on the books. At this
   point, they don't exist. Now their program is
   about to get a lot of press and they will no
   longer enjoy obscurity, so they want to tighten
   their system up as much as possible. They know
   that some people will still get in, but if people
   are going to get in, it will only be people who
   are talented enough to do it. Not someone who
   accidentally got in or used a simple hole to get
   in. (2) When they do catch a person inside the
   system, how do they know what their intention is?
   The biggest fear of hackers and crackers
   everywhere is, what is their intention? You find
   one, you don't know what the hell they're doing
   and that scares the hell out of you.

   They felt a lot more comfortable after I told them
   the basic types of hackers. Now, they see someone
   in their system, they're more likely after a few
   minutes of tracking them to know who they are,
   what they're after, whether to worry about them or
   not.

   You can usually tell what a hacker's after from
   what they do when they get in. They start to look
   for directories like "nuke" and "secret" that
   might be a problem. But then again it might not.
   These guys knew the concept of "trophy-grabbing."
   There might be a kid who downloads the plans for a
   Stealth fighter to his computer and puts them on a
   diskette and throws it up on the wall. 'Hey, I got
   a trophy!' He isn't going to sell it to a spy. He
   wouldn't know who to sell it to if his life
   depended on it. To him, it's just, 'Hey, I got a
   copy of a stealth fighter sitting on my
   bookshelf!'"

   Se7en was a well-known phreaker who knew his way
   around the telephone system. I asked how he got
   into phreaking.

When asked moderately technical questions about telephone switches,
se7en could not answer any of them. Instead, he diverted the line of 
discussion to more non-technical matters.

   "My introduction to phreaking was being taken
   around by someone a few years older than me who
   said, hey, we're going to go dig in the trash of
   the telephone company. I was like, well what the
   hell for? He goes, 'Trust me. This will blow your
   mind.' Well, it did, it blew my mind for the next
   ten years.

   We went through the trash, and in my eyes, all we
   had was a bunch of paper. I was not impressed. But
   he was sorting them and saying, OK, these are
   good, these are bad, these are good. He was trying
   to get me interested in something I saw no
   interest in. I was young. I was about fifteen
   years old. To me it was basically worthless,
   looking at a hunch of food and trash, and it
   wasn't until I went over to the guy's house the
   next night, and he says, remember these five or
   six pieces of paper I grabbed? He fires it up and
   boom! there we are, we're in the phone company.
   'We're in the phone company?' Yeah, he said. I can
   do anything I want in here. He had found a dialup.
   He already knew quite a bit about the phone
   system. But he warned me, Don't be one of those
   punks or lusers that makes free phone calls. Learn
   how it works. Be one of the people who learns how
   it works.

   That was our goal: to understand how things work.

   The things we did used to be considered normal
   teenage behavior, remember, teenage pranks, Now
   it's a felony. Now you're part of a conspiracy.
   It's more complex today.

   Even if they don't send you to jail, they'll
   confiscate your equipment. They like to scare the
   hell out of you. You become an annoyance, they'll
   take your computers and you'll never get them
   back, no matter what you do. That's pretty good
   for knocking a lot of kids out. But it can have
   the opposite effect. Some people like the Legion
   of Doom or the other hackers that have gotten
   busted, the government did that to shut them up,
   but they all came back and they came back angry.
   The last thing the government needs is someone
   they don't understand coming back with an agenda.

   There were a lot of great discoveries through the
   years, but for me, the greatest was how I grew in
   knowledge and power in my own eyes. The giant
   telephone company and many of the all-knowing
   corporations really had very little clue as to
   what they were doing. The government, the
   all-powerful government -- starting wars,
   controlling your life -- did not have a clue as to
   what a computer is or what it can do.

   The realization that all these people that as a
   kid you're told to respect and fear, in a lot of
   ways you have it more together and are a lot
   smarter than many of these people....

   It's a power rush, that's what it is. You find out
   there's absolutely nothing special about these
   people. Here you are, some little fifteen or
   sixteen year old kid, you can do things that the
   phone company can't even do, or the government
   can't even do. The phone company doesn't even know
   what you're talking about when you tell them
   something you've been doing for years. That's the
   greatest discovery.

   Today the real power belongs to people who have
   knowledge, who know how to do things. The others
   are hiding behind an illusion of power? Behind
   smoke and mirrors?

   Exactly.